| |
Dramatica Theory Book
Chapter
30: Storytelling and Encoding Theme
(Continued)
What Are You Talking
About?
Without theme, a story
is just a series of events that proceeds logistically and ends up one
way or another. Theme is what gives it all meaning. When encoded, theme
will not be a universal meaning for all things, but a smaller truth pertaining
to the proper way of dealing with a particular situation.
In a sense, the encoding of theme moves the emotional argument of the
story from the general to the specific. It the argument is made strongly
enough, it may influence attitudes in areas far beyond the specific, but
to be made strongly, it must limit its scope to precise encoding.
If our thematic conflict is Morality vs. Self-interest, for example, it
would be a mistake to try and argue that Morality is always better
than Self-Interest. In fact, there would be few people whose life experience
would not tell them that sometimes Self-Interest is the better of the
two. Keep in mind here that Dramatica defines Morality as "Doing
for others with no regard for self" and Self-Interest as "Doing
for self with no regard for others." This doesn't mean a Self-Interested
person is out hurt to others, but simply that what happens to others,
good or bad, is not even a consideration.
As an example, Morality might be better if one has plenty of food to share
during a harsh winter and does so. Morality might be worse if one subjugates
one's life rather than displease one's peers. Self-Interest might be better
if a crazed maniac is charging at you and you kill him with an ax. Self-Interest
might be bad if you won't share the last of the penicillin in case you
might need it later. It really all depends on the context.
Clearly, the very first step in encoding thematic appreciations is to
check the definitions first! Dramatica was designed to be extremely precise
in its definitions in order to make sure the thematic structure represented
all the shades of gray an audience might expect to see in a thematic argument.
So, before you even consider the conflict, read the definition which will
help define where the real conflict lies.
Unlike other appreciations which really only need to show up once to be
encoded into a story, thematic appreciations will need to show up several
times. A good rule of thumb is that each conflict should be explored at
least once per act. In this way, the balance between the two sides of
the conflict can be examined in all contexts appropriate to story's message.
Further, it is heavy handed to encode the entire conflict. It is much
better to show one side of the conflict, then later show the other side
in a similar situation. In this manner, the relative value of each side
of the thematic conflict is established without the two ever being directly
compared. In each act, then, what are some methods of encoding the two
sides of the thematic conflict? This depends on which throughline is in
question.
|