previous page | next page

GOING BEYOND THE THREE AND FOUR ACT STRUCTURES

Using the Dramatica model of story provides a way to better understand the rich varieties of both the three-act and four-act structures of stories. The act transitions provide a greater sense of a story's flow. The throughlines provide opportunities to explore synchronous and asynchronous throughline development. Examining stories as signposts and journeys gives an author both an understanding of a story's structural organization, and a sense of how an audience may experience the story. But there's still more.

 

Witness Example

 

OS

Z

MC

Z

IC

Z

SS

H

In presenting the examples, several unspoken givens were made:

  • Every act is of the same duration.

  • Every BUMP transition is jarring while every SLIDE transition is smooth.

  • Every throughline begins and ends in unison with the other throughlines.

  • Every throughline is given equal emphasis by the author.

The truth is, these are artificial givens which authors frequently ignore while writing. The "bumpiness" or "smoothness" of act transitions relies as much upon an author's storytelling as the content being explored. Act lengths frequently vary within a throughline and between throughlines. Throughlines often begin and end out of unison and are rarely given equal weight by the author. This provides much needed flexibility for an author.

 

Witness Example with Unequal Throughlines

OS

MC

IC

SS

If we define "act breaks" as the transition between acts (especially those identified as BUMPS), then the lack of rigid synchronicity between throughlines becomes a powerful tool to bend a story's structure to the needs of a particular form.

 

Witness Example with Staggered Throughlines

OS

MC

IC

SS

For instance, television often requires more than the obvious two or three act breaks that the three and four-act structures provide. Therefore, to add additional act breaks, all an author needs to do is slip the transition from one of the throughlines to occur earlier or later than those in the remaining throughlines. With each throughline having at least two to three naturally occurring act breaks (not to mention the potential for prologues and epilogues), this provides an author with eight to twelve convenient opportunities to end a scene at a natural act turn.

An author can emphasize a particular act break by having more than one throughline break at the same time. This is frequently used to heighten the last act of a story. It can just as easily be used to downplay or juxtapose throughlines.

There are several other general guidelines to consider while constructing your story:

  • Avoid getting your story throughlines too out-of-synch with each other. It can end up confusing an audience.

  • Try not to end a throughline long before or long after the other throughlines. There's nothing worse than the sense that the story's over but the throughline isn't.

  • Always take into consideration the emphasis you give to a throughline when considering how you want to tinker with its internal rhythm (act lengths and transitions). The more emphasized a throughline is, the better it is for you to be conservative with the throughline's pacing. The less emphasized, the more latitude you have to be playful with its pacing.

previous page | next page

 

 

Copyright © 1994-2009 Write Brothers, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Based on theories and materials developed by Melanie Anne Phillips and Chris Huntley
Dramatica is a registered trademark of Screenplay Systems Incorporated. Patent #5,734,916; #6,105,046