Film & TV Reviews
Constructive Criticisms
Story Analyses
Articles 
Storyforms
 

Movie Analysis:

"Thank You For Smoking"

Analysis by Chris Huntley

Thank You For Smoking is a satirical, politically incorrect, hilarious examination of the Washington lobbyist world. Aaron Eckhart plays Nick Naylor, lobbyist extraordinaire for the Tobacco industry. The film follows Nick “doing his job” with his twelve-year-old son in tow. Nick’s ability to spin any argument to his favor and against his opponent is amazing and the source of many of the film's laughs. Though entertaining, Thank You For Smoking loses some of its effectiveness by under developing Nick’s personal issues and his relationship with his son. Even so, Thank You For Smoking is an engaging, thoroughly offensive, and genuinely funny film experience.

SPOILERS AHEAD

The Overall Story throughline revolves around the Tobacco industry’s efforts to prevent Senator Ortolan K. Finistirre’s from nailing them for peddling addictive, unhealthy products (Story Goal). Finistirre wants to accomplish this by forcing a discussion about putting a skull and crossbones label on all cigarette packaging (Story Driver of Decision [Deliberation]). Through aggressive “spin,” bribes, and innovative product placements, Tobacco lobbyist Nick Naylor is able to thwart Senator Finistirre’s efforts—at least for most of the story. It’s not until Naylor is kidnapped by anti-smoking thugs and nearly killed by a lethal dose of nicotine that Nick’s star begins to fade. A “tell all” article by reporter (and Naylor’s new sex partner), Heather Holloway, drives the final nail in Nick’s Tobacco lobbyist career. Nick is able to resurrect his credibility by appearing at Senator Finistirre’s congressional committee, but Tobacco’s dirty secrets are out in the open and it’s only a couple of months after the hearing that the Tobacco industry is hit with major lawsuits (Story Outcome: Failure).

Structurally speaking, Thank You For Smoking is weakened by its unclear development of the Main Character’s personal throughline. Nick Naylor is clearly the Main Character. His son, Joey, is supposed to be the Impact Character. The MC/IC Relationship throughline is supposed to be about their divorced dad/son relationship.

So what’s wrong with Nick’s personal throughline? I think the problem comes from confusing Nick’s role as protagonist in the Overall Story throughline (pro-smoking advocate) with his role as absent parent and role model for son Joey.

As protagonist, lobbyist Naylor is a steadfast supporter of Tobacco even offering to buy his son his first pack of cigarettes on his eighteenth birthday if his son wants to try smoking. This is as it should be. As a character in the Overall Story throughline, the protagonist doesn’t change. However, over the course of the story Nick seriously questions his steadfastness and the moral correctness of his position on tobacco. When he does, his son reminds him of his skills and goals and gets Nick back in the game. That’s Main Character and Impact Character stuff and does not belong as part of the protagonist’s journey through the Overall Story.

As Main Character, Nick goes from emotionally absent father who puts work above family to a father first and foremost. We see this by Nick’s refusal to go back to work for the Tobacco lobby in order to go independent. As a lobbyist for hire, he controls his time and makes sure his new priorities dictate his schedule (MC Resolve: Change; Story Judgment: Good).

Herein lies the structural problem with Thank You For Smoking. Nick doesn’t grow to the point where he can change—he just changes.

The confusion between protagonist and Main Character functions shows how character development is made in the wrong place within the inappropriate context. The story COULD have been about a lobbyist questioning the amorality of his job. The story COULD have been about an absent father changing his life priorities in order to spend more time with his son. But, the story cannot have a Main Character trying to do both. They are different problems with different paths toward resolution. The reason Thank You For Smoking doesn’t make an effective argument is because the Main Character Growth explores Nick’s questioning of the correctness of his profession yet the Main Character Resolve addresses Nick’s desire to be more available to his son Joey. The solution? Pick one topic and explore the MC Growth and MC Resolve in terms of that topic. Once you’ve done that, the Impact Character throughline and the MC/IC Relationship throughline are much easier to develop properly.

Thank You For Smoking’s structural flaws aside, the story holds together as an entertaining, if irreverent and lopsided, inside look at the world of Washington lobbyists. On the whole, it works well. Clarifying the Main Character throughline would make the story better by making it as emotionally satisfying as it is intellectually.

 

 

Copyright © 1994-2006 Write Brothers, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Based on theories and materials developed by Melanie Anne Phillips and Chris Huntley
Dramatica is a registered trademark of Screenplay Systems Incorporated. Patent #5,734,916; #6,105,046