Failure
to Launch “lifts off” as a quirky, by-the-numbers
romantic comedy. It’s built on an amusing conceit: The parents
of an adult male child who refuses to leave the comforts of home
hire a professional “motivator” whose sole job is to ‘launch” said
slacker into a life on his own. It has attractive and likeable characters.
There’s even chemistry between the two leads, Matthew McConaughey
and Sarah Jessica Parker. Unfortunately, the story is ejected mid-flight
and the movie ends with a forced landing.
SPOILERS AHEAD
Failure
to Launch starts off following Tripp (Matthew McConaughey), a happy-go-lucky
boat broker unwilling to keep a girlfriend once she gives him “the
look,” meaning she’s
ready to get into a serious relationship with him. His way of getting
rid of girlfriends is to bring them home so they find out he still
lives with his parents. They break up with him and his comfortable
bachelorhood remains intact.
Tripp’s parents want him to move out but are afraid to confront
him directly for fear he will feel rejected. They hire Paula (Sarah
Jessica Parker) to motivate him to leave the nest so that they may
enjoy their senior years in private. Paula’s technique is to
lure unsuspecting men from living in their parents’ home by
creating a relationship with them. Paula has found that these thirtysomething
slackers see the advantages of being on their own once they’re
in a “successful relationship” away from family.
Tripp
falls for Paula’s wiles and all goes per her plan until
she unwittingly gives Tripp “the look” (Paula
is smitten with Tripp). The next thing she knows she’s brought
home to meet the parents. Paula is surprised when Tripp’s parents
take her aside and tell her she’s failed—Tripp is about
to break up with her. Shocked and desperate to fulfill her contractual
obligations, Paula breaks her own rules and sleeps with Tripp that
night.
Tripp
is back onboard after the night of awesome sex, but Paula is now
seriously conflicted. Paula has crossed an ethical line between
her personal and professional lives. Struggling
to get back on track, Paula continues with her plan to get Tripp
to move out.
Unfortunately
for her, Tripp’s friends
figure out what’s going on. They tell her about Tripp’s
past—his fiancé died years earlier—and how he
has not gotten over it. Paula decides to end her professional relationship
with Tripp and come clean.
Tripp
prepares a special dinner for Paula and
his parents. Before Paula has a chance to tell him about her job
and her feelings, Tripp announces that he wants to move in with
Paula. In fact, he proposes that they build an extension on
his parents’ house
so they can both live there—that way his parents won’t
have to pay Paula to sleep with him. Tripp storms out leaving his
parents and Paula stunned.
Paula
is devastated. She decides to quit her business.
Ironically,
Tripp moves away from home.
Paula
returns her fee to Tripp’s
parents and begs forgiveness for the mess. Paula also decides to
pack up and move back the West Coast to live with her parents.
On a
visit to his parents, Tripp’s mother tells him she didn’t
want him to leave because of perceived problems with Tripp’s
dad.
Paula’s friend Kit gets together with Tripp’s two best
friends and Tripp’s parents. They concoct a plan to reunite
the stubborn lovebirds. On the way to the airport to drop Paula off,
Kit tricks her into making a stop and Kit manages to lock Paula in
a room with Tripp. The friends and parents watch via remote camera
and Paula and Tripp reconcile. Happy ending.
So,
what’s
wrong with Failure to Launch?
The
biggest flaw is the confusion between the Main Character and Impact
Character throughlines. For the first half of the film Tripp is
the Main Character and Paula is the Impact Character. About midway
through the film (about the time Paula finds out that she’s
being dumped by Tripp) Paula becomes the Main Character and Tripp
(or maybe Kit) becomes the Impact Character….sort of. Suddenly
the audience finds out that Paula has a bunch of personal baggage
(such as no personal life) and is expected to switch Main Characters
mid-story. It doesn’t work. Even though it is easy to identify
with Paula, it’s not her personal story we’ve been exploring.
The story falls apart at this point.
This
makes the last act forced and phony. The fact that the Overall
Story characters lock the new MC and IC in a room together is contrived.
And there’s the, “Since we’re locked in here together
we might as well talk,” excuse to motivate the resolution of
their differences and realize they’re in love with each other---eeeeekkk.
Crash and Burn.
What could fix Failure to Launch?
-
Pick
a Main Character and stick with him or her. Tripp’s
personal journey is different from Paula’s. Tripp’s
story would be about a wounded man who learns to love again.
Paula’s
story would be about a woman awakened to the void in her personal
life that had been hidden by her professional life. Pick one
and stay with it. As it stands, the ending makes no sense since
you can’t
tell if Tripp or Paula has changed or remained steadfast or
what they had to change or remain steadfast about.
-
Pick
the partner in the romantic relationship as the Impact Character.
It IS, after all, a romantic comedy. That means a major part
of the story is about the Main Character and the Impact Character
and their romantic (MC/IC) relationship.
-
If
the story goal is to get Tripp out of his parents’ house
then the Overall Story should end when he moves out. In the
current version, the movie does not end for another twenty-five
minutes or so.
-
The
Overall Story characters’ efforts should be geared
toward (or against) the Story Goal. If Tripp’s mom in
an enabler, make her work through those fears with Paula, not
Tripp. Make Tripp’s
father’s nudity part of the efforts to get Tripp out
of the house, not a result of his leaving.
Fixing the above might possibly be enough to make an ending such
as the one in the movie work. Forcing the couple to resolve their
misunderstandings is fine so long as everything has built up to that
scene. When done properly, the momentum of the growing relationship
and character growth propels the story to its natural conclusion.