Movie Analysis:
"Stigmata"
Review by Katharine
E. Monahan Huntley
Obtaining
(objective story goal) a living gospel that may render the institution
of the Catholic Church impotent is the premise of Stigmata, written
by Tom Lazarus and Rick Ramage, and directed by Rupert Wainwright-the
latest take on the politics of religion and the power of blind faith
(os solution). To understand the pointlessness of the film, you
have to read the denouement that follows the last scene-an assertion
that the lost biblical Book of St. Thomas, purported to be the true
and final gospel of Jesus, was discovered in the late 1940's. The Vatican
refused to recognize the findings-and more than fifty years later neither
its existence nor the denial of its validity have appeared to have had
any impact on the Catholic community. Again, what is the meaning of
Stigmata's premise?
To make matters
more confusing, the other three Dramatica perspectives obscure the objective
story. At the forefront is the obstacle character's throughline,
atheist (oc problem-disbelief) Frankie-all MTV music and metallic
make-up-a hair stylist living la vida loca. A rosary taken from a devout
deceased priest in Brazil, and mailed as a gift to Frankie, results
in the girl becoming (subjective story concern) afflicted
with stigmata (oc domain-universe). Her situation is brought
to the attention of main character Father Andrew Kiernan, a scientist
(male mental sex) and special investigator for the Vatican. Predictable
political machinations (os domain-physics) and special Exorcist
effects play out right up to the cliché finish.
The Stigmata
storytelling may be "So what?"-but intriguing from a Dramatica
point of view are two storyforms (see attached) that give the
film a dualistic feel. The obvious first
storyform contains variations and elements typical
of a story with a religious topic-an objective story thematic conflict
of morality vs. self-interest and problem of disbelief-solution
of faith. A focus of conscience and direction
of temptation appear in the objective, subjective, and main character
throughlines.
Delving deeper,
the second
storyform comprised of the same character and plot dynamics
shades the story. The domains and signpost order are identical
to the first storyform, as well. With the exception of the benchmark,
requirement, prerequisite, precondition, and forewarnings-which
all correspond in a dependent position to the first storyform-the
appreciations are the dynamic opposite of the first storyform.
For example, the objective story thematic conflict is experience
vs. skill and problem of non-accurate-solution
of accurate.
Of course, a well-written
Dramatica grand argument story provides illustrations of all
Dramatica elements and appreciations. That Stigmata offers dual
storyforms and so-so what? storytelling-well that is indeed a sin.
Stigmata
storyform #1 story engine settings
Stigmata
storyform #2 story engine settings
|